While a professor at MIT, being a founder of both the Artificial Intelligence Lab and the Media Lab, Seymour Papert developed novel pedagogies based on the emerging approach of information processing models. He claimed, and many august researchers corroborate, that he was able to craft learning environments in which middle school students would develop intuitions of physics that surpassed MIT undergrads. More compellingly, in place of the "firehose" of hard work unleashed upon MIT students, the middle schoolers were encouraged to play and explore based on their own interest and aesthetic sensibilities. And yet, his methods have yet to be widely adopted or even acknowledged. Sound familiar? It has been argued by Papert and by members of our own community that, while powerful, the logic of clinical trials may inhibit the development of truly superior learning technologies - leading more towards the development of an optimal horse and buggy than to the automobile. Of course, innovators like Feldenkrais^® and Papert will continue to develop incredible new things - but how can we scale these innovations more broadly into a culture dominated by the logic of clinical trials and “evidence based” interventions? I sure don’t know! We should, however, discuss the matter.